Tuesday, January 15, 2013

UC-AFT Public Comment for Regents Meeting (1/16/13)

1. We appreciate the increased funding from the state, but this does not make up for years of reductions; moreover, we are concerned about the push for online education.

2. While many of our faculty members already use digital technologies in different ways, we have not found that the use of high-quality online courses reduces costs; in fact, due to the need for staffing, new equipment, and software, they may drive up costs.

3. Already the UC Online Pilot Program has failed to meet most of its projections. Millions have been spent on marketing and course development, but only a few non-UC students have enrolled.

4. In fact, we have already driven down the costs of undergraduate instruction in the UC system through the use of large classes and non-tenured faculty; moving these classes online will not save money. The stress on online education is a distraction from the real cost drivers: administration, professional education, medical centers, athletics, sponsored research, and amenities.

5. If a professor teaches 4 courses and makes $100,000 a year, the per student direct instructional cost for a class of 250 students is $100; in the case of a non-tenured faculty member, the cost on average is $40; online education will not lower these costs. Even if you eliminate all of the teachers, you still need to pay someone to design the courses, interact with the students, administer the program, and grade the papers. Online education is a recipe for administrative bloat.

6. Students have a hard time graduating on time because they are sometimes unprepared for university-level work, they are weeded out of high-demand majors, they need to work at jobs to pay for the total cost of education, they are alienated in large lecture classes, and courses are graded on a distributed curve (some students have to fail in this system): online education will not help solve these issues.

7. We need a transparent accounting of the real cost drivers in the UC system.

13 comments:

  1. Bob,
    I am sympathetic with much of what you write but I am not convinced that sponsored research costs UC. I suspect the contrary. The more than 50% overhead on all salary line items brings in major revenue. That is why UC wants to reduce undergraduate education and focus on research.

    I do suspect that UC administrators and faculty make out like bandits with technology transfers. Lots of private money is made from research paid for by tax payers. UC could recoup lots more money here. I am not sure if you have read Jennifer Washburn's excellent book University, Inc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Commission on the Future found that other similar institutions collect on average 60% for overhead on their grants, but the UC averages closer to 26%, so the UC system is losing about $300 million a year. In fact, no one knows if research grants on the whole lose or gain money because no one knows the true cost of overhead. The UC may pursue grants because they think it turns a profit or because it brings prestige or it helps society.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi,
    I have pondered the problem you say. But in fact, no one knows if research grants on the whole lose or gain money because no one knows the true cost of overhead

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Also it would be good to talk about the http://besteditingservices.org/ just salivate over that number but don't drill down on it. Where are those applications coming from? how many of them are qualified? etc.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It really is a problem that wouldn't be solved if the true cost of overhead isn't known. Research grants shouldn't be taken for granted because it's a big part of the funding of the school and the school would mostly benefit from the experiment results and college papers produced. Hopefully, everything would be solved.

    ReplyDelete
  7. ainol professional brand website !

    ReplyDelete
  8. H I just wanted to comment on your blog and say I really enjoyed reading your blog here. It was very informative and I also digg the way you write! Keep it up and I'll be back soon to find out more mate.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It may well be, rather, that when, say, a company or organization is asked by the media to provide a spokesperson to comment on some damn thing, it provides a man rather than a woman quotes

    ReplyDelete
  10. The urgency to drive digital revenues increased this year as media companies sought new ways to offset declining print revenues or to build sustainable digital-only publishing brands.Thanks http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptpnJY1Kaks

    ReplyDelete
  11. I As Well do suspect that UC administrators and faculty make out like bandits with technology transfers. Lots of private money is made from research paid for by tax payers. UC could recoup lots more money here. I am not sure if you have read Jennifer Washburn's excellent book University, Inc.

    ReplyDelete
  12. We know the old adage - that April showers bring coach factory outlet - but we're impatient! We want those heartwarming, spirit-lifting plants to blossom now! You just never know, and even on coach outlet store online when you're not looking for trouble, trouble could find coach factory outlet; in the form of a good ol' fashion fisticuffs.This coach outlet store roundup mourns Peaches Geldof, celebrates tiffany jewelry's marriage, embraces spring, and reveals the face of a new coach factory fragrance.Even if we're not Fashion tiffany and co bound, we're always seeking coach outlet online. This time it comes in the form of michael kors outlet online, classic stripes, and statement heels.The true religion jeans is always chic and exact. There is such a sense of michael kors outlet in wearing steely gray, especially when you do it with coach outlet. What you might not know: what a day in the life of a pro celine outlet really looks like. If you're unsure, I'll make it easy for you to decide: the coach factory outlet is YES.The tasty treats from toms shoes company are hittin' the spot with their sweet breakfast-y flavor and adorable elephant shape.alexander wang shoes to the present day, the alexander wang bags features stunning costumes but is still not dramatic enough to do justice to its glamorous subject.So, when celine bags offered me the chance to stay at a hotel, have a consultation with a sleep doctor and have my own little sleep sanctuary, that was an offer I definitely wasn't about to turn down.The toms usa has just opened a new website, so now you can see what you've been missing out on.

    ReplyDelete